Should the people questioning the social contract especially the Malay rights, they should study the history of the formation of Malaysia.
All Malaysian especially politicians should try to use great sensitivity to the feelings of the multi-racial Faith-Based Initiative in the Malaysian Constitution for the prosperity and stability of the country.
Ironically, Malaysian politics has been relatively stable and people should appreciate it. Due to the sensitivity involved in race relation, ground rules are set in the Federal and state Constitutions.
A social contract is the contract entered into by the founding fathers of the nation between the Malays and non-Malays before independence.
Ironically, the unique situation in Malaysia should not be compared to other countries and questioning the social contract entered into by the founding fathers of the nation could have negative repercussions and lead to disharmony.
Attempts to question the social contract will certainly lead to social and economic upheaval. It served us well in the 51 years Malaysia has been an independent nation and there is no reason to keep questioning it.
The racial harmony and national stability clearly evident in Malaysia all the while was because of the understanding and respect the people had for each other.
The social contract in Malaysia refers to the agreement made by the country's founding fathers in the Constitution. The social contract usually refers to a quid pro quo trade-off through Articles 14–18 of the Constitution, pertaining to the granting of citizenship to the non-Malay people of Malaysia, and Article 153, which grants the Malays special rights and privileges.
All Malaysian especially politicians should try to use great sensitivity to the feelings of the multi-racial Faith-Based Initiative in the Malaysian Constitution for the prosperity and stability of the country.
Ironically, Malaysian politics has been relatively stable and people should appreciate it. Due to the sensitivity involved in race relation, ground rules are set in the Federal and state Constitutions.
A social contract is the contract entered into by the founding fathers of the nation between the Malays and non-Malays before independence.
Ironically, the unique situation in Malaysia should not be compared to other countries and questioning the social contract entered into by the founding fathers of the nation could have negative repercussions and lead to disharmony.
Attempts to question the social contract will certainly lead to social and economic upheaval. It served us well in the 51 years Malaysia has been an independent nation and there is no reason to keep questioning it.
The racial harmony and national stability clearly evident in Malaysia all the while was because of the understanding and respect the people had for each other.
The social contract in Malaysia refers to the agreement made by the country's founding fathers in the Constitution. The social contract usually refers to a quid pro quo trade-off through Articles 14–18 of the Constitution, pertaining to the granting of citizenship to the non-Malay people of Malaysia, and Article 153, which grants the Malays special rights and privileges.
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment